Jump to main content
Harmonic Analysis
Philipp Reiter
Harmonic Analysis 

Knot energies

In 1992, Jun O'Hara [O'H] introduced the family of knot energies Eα,p(γ)=R/Z×R/Z(1|γ(x)γ(y)|α1dγ(x,y)α)p|γ(x)||γ(y)|dxdy

The range of O'Hara's energies

where γ:R/ZR3 is an absolutely continuous embedded curve and dγ(x,y) denotes the intrinsic distance of γ(x) and γ(y). They are well-defined with values in [0,], non-singular if (α2)p<1, and self-avoiding if αp2.

Möbius energy

The element (α,p)=(2,1) was named Möbius energy by Freedman, He, and Wang [FHW] after they discovered its invariance under Möbius transformations in R3. Exploiting this particular property, they have been able to prove C1,1 regularity of local minimizers. Subsequently He [H] noticed that the first derivative of the energy has a pseudo-differential structure which allowed for proving C regularity.

The characterization of the energy space of E2,1, namely the fractional Sobolev space W3/2,2, by Blatt [Bl] allowed for extending He's result to critical points by employing techniques from the theory of fractional harmonic maps into spheres [BRS]. The proof does not rely on Möbius invariance at all.

In the context of the Smale Conjecture, it is a meaningful question whether there exist nontrivial critical points of E2,1 within the unknot class [Bu].

What about other energies?

He's arguments can be applied to the energies Eα,1, α(2,3), as well [R]. This is essentially due to the fact that all energy spaces are Hilbert spaces [Bl]. Exploiting the latter result, one can prove C smoothness of stationary points without imposing any assumption on their initial regularity [BR1].

The situation of p>1 is much more involved and subject of ongoing research.

Interestingly, despite modeling different geometrical concepts, other energy families such as the tangent-point potential or the integer Menger curvature turn out to be very similar to O'Hara's energies from an analyst's perspective [BR2, BR3]. An overview is provided in [BR4].

References

[Bl] Simon Blatt. Boundedness and regularizing effects of O’Hara’s knot energies. J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 21(1):1250010, 2012. [ doi ]
[Bu] Ryan Budney. A gorgeous but incomplete proof of “The Smale Conjecture”. Oct. 2016. [ blog ]
[BR1] Simon Blatt and Philipp Reiter. Stationary points of O’Hara’s knot energies. Manuscripta Math., 40(1-2):29–50, 2013. [ arXiv | doi ]
[BR2] Simon Blatt and Philipp Reiter. Regularity theory for tangent-point energies: The non-degenerate sub-critical case. Adv. Calc. Var., 8(2):93–116, 2015. [ arXiv | doi ]
[BR3] Simon Blatt and Philipp Reiter. Towards a regularity theory for integral Menger curvature. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 40(1):149–181, 2015. [ arXiv | doi ]
[BR4] Simon Blatt and Philipp Reiter. Modeling repulsive forces on fibres via knot energies. Mol. Based Math. Biol., 2(1):56–72, 2014. [ preprint | doi ]
[BRS] Simon Blatt, Philipp Reiter, and Armin Schikorra. Harmonic analysis meets critical knots. Critical points of the Möbius energy are smooth. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 368:6391–6438, 2016. [ arXiv | doi ]
[FHW] Michael H. Freedman, Zheng-Xu He, and Zhenghan Wang. Möbius energy of knots and unknots. Ann. of Math. (2), 139(1):1–50, 1994. [ jstor ]
[H] Zheng-Xu He. The Euler-Lagrange equation and heat flow for the Möbius energy. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 53(4):399–431, 2000.[ doi ]
[O'H] Jun O’Hara. Family of energy functionals of knots. Topology Appl., 48(2):147–161, 1992. [ open archive ]
[R] Philipp Reiter. Repulsive knot energies and pseudodifferential calculus for O’Hara’s knot energy family E(α), α[2,3). Math. Nachr., 285(7):889–913, 2012. [ preprint | doi ]